From “Are you OK?” to defensible action: how managers should respond when someone isn’t coping at work

When someone’s behaviour, attendance, or performance shifts, most managers default to one of two patterns:

  • they avoid the conversation until things escalate, or

  • they try to support the person, but do it informally — and nothing gets documented, reviewed, or followed through.

Neither is ideal.

A practical approach is to treat these situations as workplace risk management: notice changes early, respond proportionately, and escalate when risk increases. This is exactly why we developed the Winnchester Risk Triage — a Green / Amber / Red decision aid that helps leaders take consistent action without trying to diagnose or counsel.

What managers should focus on (and what they shouldn’t)

A manager’s job is not to determine what’s happening medically. A manager’s job is to manage:

  • the work impact (attendance, output, errors, safety, conflict),

  • the risk level (low / elevated / urgent), and

  • the support and expectations required to keep the workplace safe and functioning.

That distinction matters because it keeps the conversation respectful, role-appropriate, and legally defensible.

The pattern we see in SMEs (and how to fix it)

In small to medium businesses, issues often escalate because leaders don’t have a shared method. The common gaps are:

  1. No shared language for risk
    One supervisor calls it “a bad week”, another calls it “misconduct”, and HR gets involved too late.

  2. Support without structure
    Leaders offer flexibility, but there’s no clear timeframe, review point, or expectation setting.

  3. Documentation is inconsistent
    Notes are vague (“seems stressed”), impacts aren’t captured, and decisions can’t be explained later.

  4. Escalation triggers are unclear
    Everyone hopes the situation will resolve — until it becomes safety-related or formal.

The fix isn’t bureaucracy. It’s a repeatable leader process.

A practical leader process that works

When a concern arises, the most effective response is consistent, simple, and time-bound:

1) Describe the facts (not the story)

Use neutral observations:

  • “You’ve been late three times this week”

  • “There have been more errors in orders than usual”

  • “You left site abruptly after the toolbox talk”

  • “There’s been increased conflict with colleagues”

Avoid assumptions (“You’re burnt out”, “You’re anxious”, “You’re depressed”).

2) Check in with care and clarity

Your tone should be supportive, but your language should be specific.

  • acknowledge what you’ve observed

  • invite the person to share what would help at work

  • confirm available supports (EAP/GP/internal)

3) Match the response to risk (Green / Amber / Red)

This is where triage matters.

  • Green: early concern — monitor and support

  • Amber: elevated concern — add structure, involve HR/WHS, formalise adjustments, and review

  • Red: urgent — prioritise safety and immediate escalation procedures

The key is proportionality: not every issue is Red, but ignoring Amber is how businesses end up in Red.

4) Agree actions, expectations, and a review date

Support is not “set and forget”. Agree:

  • what will change (temporary adjustments / supports),

  • what success looks like (work expectations), and

  • when you’ll review (a clear date/time).

5) Document the essentials

Documentation doesn’t need to be heavy. It needs to be usable:

  • what was observed (facts)

  • what was discussed (high level, respectful)

  • what was agreed (actions + timeframe)

  • what the next review point is

  • who else was involved (if escalated)

This protects the employee and the business, and it improves follow-through.

Where psychosocial safety and performance management intersect

A common misconception is that “mental health” and “performance management” are mutually exclusive. They’re not.

You can be supportive and clear on expectations. In fact, clarity and predictability often reduce stress and improve outcomes. Where risk is elevated, the best practice response is usually:

  • supportive check-ins plus structure

  • reasonable adjustments plus accountability

  • timely escalation plus documented decisions

How Winnchester can help

If you want leaders to act earlier — and act consistently — the leverage point is your manager system:

  • escalation triggers and roles (who does what, when)

  • check-in scripts and prompt cards

  • documentation standards that are simple and defensible

  • alignment between HR, WHS, and operational leaders

If you’d like a tailored implementation for your business, book a short call and we’ll map a practical approach that fits your team size and risk profile.

Previous
Previous

When you change a part-time roster, you might be “terminating” without realising it

Next
Next

The new deal: how employee expectations are reshaping people & culture in SMEs